Monday, November 1, 2010

Objectified by Gary Hustwit

Objectified is a film documentary by Gary Hustwit about the design in everyday objects that we use, from a camera, chair, and phone to a computer. He features several of professionals within the various design fields, like Jonathan Ive from Apple and Dieter Rams. They discuss various topics such as the importance of sustainability in its relation to good design today, because it has become of greater need for us to have. There was also conversation on how "we revisit the archetype" to make "newer" product according to Rob Walker in order to sell more things.
I feel like this film gave me greater insight into the in depth thought process that designers go through, such as Jonathan Ive from Apple demonstrated. He went into such detail about how they thought about the smallest details and trying to find solutions in order to make them less apparent and more as if it "were meant to be designed that way" was somewhere along the lines of how he explained it. His whole explanation of thought process reveals to us the consumer how serious they are about the products that they put out. Its very evident in how we view their products, one of the number one reasons why I prefer Apple computers is that they have a simple design and concept. It was very easy for me to maneuver and work my first Apple computer because it was self explanatory and easy to grasp.
Overall I feel like this film is a great way to gain a newfound appreciation into mass produced industrial objects because its interesting and you get great insight from people who know design and who have been in the field for awhile.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Gestalt

My sketch done with a greater acknowledgment of Gestalt
My sketching subject

I think the just the word Gestalt is cool to say all by itself. It reminds me of gesture, which comes back to the meaning of the word an organized whole that is perceived as more than the sum of its parts, or even simpler how the small things relate to the big picture. And even more literal form and shape. I feel like after learning about this word and having to do sketching activities, I feel more confident in my sketching abilities than I did before. Because before when I would sketch I would have only focused on a small area and then worked my way out around whatever drawing I was doing.
This can be applied to everything design related, because when designers alike try to come up with new ideas, they can stem from a theme that id the larger picture and then after wards the smaller details come easier to fit the theme of whatever the idea was in the first place. For example, lets say you want to plan a wedding but you don’t really know what style to choose, wedding planners oftentimes consider the clients personality to dig for a style preference. Like if a client is loud and happy, their style might be more bolder, and edgier because of their personality, and this is like the big picture. Then after the client finally agrees to go with the “Edgier” style for a wedding, the cool details or the smaller aspects can be delegated.
Be it either sketching or picking a style for a wedding, Gestalt fits its way into things to make sense and to organize things.

Monday, October 18, 2010

Design as a Conversation

What first came to mind when I hear "Design as Conversation" I imagine fashion as an easy example to consider this theme. Because all people are essentially conveying a message to others without words but through fashion. It can be a as simple as a gym outfit, when we look closely we can tell what type of workout the individual is going to do. For example, if we observed a young man walking in to the arc with sneakers and basketball shorts we know he is more likely to be headed to the courts or the track, either than a group session of yoga. And this "reading" and analyzing of outfits or compositions transcends to other forms of design such as interior design. You can tell a lot about a person by looking into their personal space. They even have an exhibit at the Exploratorium, where you get to analyze a persons home and try to guess from snapshots to whom it belongs too. For example, you could tell what was important to a person by things and objects that they kept like photographs and a keepsakes. There was one social experiment at the Exploratorium that had an older male as the owner of all the things, and he had old military photos and you could tell that the military was still with him because of the way he kept all of his button up shirts neat and hung up in the closet. The conversation is everywhere, you just have to know where to look and be kind of like a detective to look for clues and signals.

Exhibit in Walker Hall, Vanishing Traditions

A shot from Hmong New Year during a ball toss courtship game
Unfortunately I was not able to make it to hear the curator Bea Roberts speak, but I was able to view the extraordinary collection of garments and ornaments. When I first walked in to the gallery I felt a sense of awe and familiarity, I have seen similar creations by the Hmong people. After doing a little research, I found out that some Hmong people migrated to Southern China, and that is probably the reason for similarity. The following link is of an article that I used as a source http://www.international.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=12590
I really felt a sense of passion and dedication in the pieces because of all the extensive details that took years and years to complete. I remember my friends in elementary telling me that their traditional garb would take a lot of time and patience to make.
Some of the differences and similarities between the garments that I noticed was that the traditional Hmong garb had a lot of bright neon colors, and some of the pieces in the collection did have a lot of color, but not neon. Another difference that I noticed was that there was a lot of garments with two or three colors, like black and gold. But one of the real big similarities was with the ornamental headdress with all the dangling charms, I remember a lot of headdresses with charms.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Product Design

I never thought I had ever noticed or admired product design, until I became a design major. I was always aware of when my candy product design suddenly changed, and I was never too enthusiastic about it. I always thought along with that old saying “If it aint broke, don’t fix it” mentality. But then after awhile I would kind of get excited to see what new thing the company’s would come up with, like the one that comes to mind is the Pepsi can label design. I clearly remember that one changing a lot of times during my childhood. I think the only reason they like to come up with new snazzy designs, is to make you think it’s a new product, and that way they sell more product. Which for a product like soda or candy I guess you need to maintain interest.

My Refrigerator

I recently noticed that the overall look of my refrigerator highly improves when it’s stocked with healthier foods. It's all of the fresh strawberries and vibrant green lettuces, complimented by the red tomatoes. It actually turns out to like a designed pattern because there are different colors, shapes and textures to look at. Whereas, when there are unhealthy foods it looks less natural, more commercial, and more or less, less appetizing. What this reminds me of is the stocked refrigerators with the glass doors at Panda Express, all of the chopped veggies ready to be cooked almost look sculptural in a way. Beautiful with their simplistic form and color, all lit and almost glowing with pride. I wish that my refrigerator could one day look something like that of Panda’s. Not just because its healthy, but because it looks like a designed piece that somebody took a lot of time and care for. The food almost looks too good to be eaten, as if we were only meant to look at it and admire it from a far. 

Sunday, October 10, 2010

Stone Soup

Stone Soup was an interesting way to experiment at just how the creative process is handled between a large group of people. I felt like in order for our group to of had had a more productive/engaging creative process, we could of used a little more forethought and planning. Because a lot of us, including myself, had no idea for what to create for the assignment. I feel like we felt trapped in the broad range of possibilities and we were unsure of what to create for our assignment. With no theme or idea or inspiration to spark our imaginations, the suggestions and ideas came in very slowly.

We first tried to brainstorm and jot down ideas to go from, then we took a brief catalogue of our supplies that we had to work with. This was just as Lauer had mentioned in Design Basics, 1. Thinking, 2. Looking, 3. Making/Doing. Which for #3 was the harder one to commit to. Another obstacle that our group encountered was staying within the time constraints; we really didn’t keep track of time until we noticed the rest of the groups were finishing up. As well as making sure that everybody helped to contribute, and had some sort of task to perform.

I understood afterwards the reason for being assigned this task, which was to work as a group creatively as we would in a future work setting. Sometimes you don’t have all the supplies or materials you may need, but you need to work with what you have creatively.


Glance at all of the groups displays.
Adding some finishing touches to our project.
Our final groups efforts.